![Prediction And Head To Head Kamil Majchrzak Vs. Aleksandar Vukic Rlvqbu0s5l Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Aleksandar Vukic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Kamil-Majchrzak-vs.-Aleksandar-Vukic-RLVQbu0s5L.jpg)
Kamil Majchrzak and Aleksandar Vukic will face off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.39
Aleksandar Vukic -> 3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Aleksandar Vukic
This will be the 2nd time that Kamil Majchrzak and Aleksandar Vukic face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Majchrzak (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Majchrzak won 6-4 6-1 in the quarter in the Prostejov Challenger back in 2020.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 126, Kamil got to the 2nd round after defeating Prajnesh Gunneswaran 6-0 0-0 ret..
In the 1st round, The Pole defeated Gunneswaran (6-0 0-0 ret.). During the match, Majchrzak scored 25 points vs Gunneswaran’s 6. Majchrzak was exceptionally aggressive to blast 8 winners.
Talking about the service games, Majchrzak recorded 3 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Kamil Majchrzak was very efficient on serve to win 100% (8/8) of his 1st serve and 67% (4/6) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Majchrzak broke Gunneswaran 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Majchrzak has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (288-175). 1-0 on grass in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Majchrzak has an overall15-9 match record in the last 9 years on grass.
Kamil has an aggregate 11-10 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
Aleksandar Vukic
Ranked no. 209, Aleksandar got to the 2nd round after defeating Max Purcell 6-1 4-1 ret., Igor Sijsling 6-4 7-65 and Marc Polmans 7-610 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Aleksandar defeated Polmans (7-610 4-6 6-3). During the match Vukic scored 115 points vs Polmans’s 108. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about serving, Vukic bagged 18 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Aleksandar Vukic was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (53/68) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Vukic broke Polmans twice after converting 14% of his break points (2/14).
Aleksandar has an overall 12-11 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Majchrzak | Vukic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
Tot Games | 6 | 67 |
Pts | 25-6 | 238-203 |
Total Points | 31 | 441 |
Winners | 8 | 104 |
%Winners | 32% | 44% |
Majchrzak played 1 match while Vukic competed in 3 matches. Vukic started his run from the qualifications while Majchrzak had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Aleksandar Vukic lost 1 set while Kamil Majchrzak hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Majchrzak has played 5 set(s) less than Vukic (3 vs 8). Therefore, Majchrzak played 61 games less than Vukic. Majchrzak scored 8 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Vukic recorded 104 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Majchrzak | Vukic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 36 |
Avg per match | 3 | 12 |
1st in | 8/14 | 130/213 |
%1st in | 57% | 61% |
1st pts | 8/8 | 104/130 |
%1st pts | 100% | 80% |
2nd pts | 4/6 | 46/83 |
%2nd pts | 67% | 55% |
Majchrzak scored 3 aces . Vukic recorded 36 aces (12 per match). Majchrzak won 100% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Vukic won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Majchrzak | Vukic |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 8 |
Converted | 3/4 | 8/28 |
% Converted | 75% | 29% |
Conceded | 0 | 7 |
Saved | 0 | 4 |
% Saved | NAN% | 57% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Pole broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Pole was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Vukic broke his opponents 8 times with a 29% conversion rate. Aleksandar conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
Majchrzak | |||
R1 Gunneswaran |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 0-0 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 6 | 6 | |
pts | 25-6 | 25-6 | |
Total points | 31 | 31 | |
Winners | 8 | 8 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 8/8 | 8/8 | |
% 1st pts | 100% | 100% | |
2nd pts | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Vukic | |||||
Q1 Purcell |
Q3 Sijsling |
R1 Polmans |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 4-1 ret. | 6-4 7-65 | 7-610 4-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 12 | 23 | 32 | 67 | |
pts | 44-21 | 79-74 | 115-108 | 238-203 | |
Total points | 65 | 153 | 223 | 441 | |
Winners | 15 | 36 | 53 | 104 | |
%Winners | 34% | 46% | 46% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 7 | 11 | 18 | 36 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
1st in | 16/32 | 46/77 | 68/104 | 130/213 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 60% | 65% | 61% | |
1st pts | 15/16 | 36/46 | 53/68 | 104/130 | |
% 1st pts | 94% | 78% | 78% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 10/16 | 16/31 | 20/36 | 46/83 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 52% | 56% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 2/10 | 2/14 | 8/28 | |
Converted % | 100% | 20% | 14% | 29% | |
Conceded | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 3/4 | 1/3 | 4 | |
Saved % | – | 75% | 33% | 108% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Nottingham 1 Challenger
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (7-5 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel EvansEvans – Matthew EbdenEbden (7-66 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Denis KudlaKudla – Liam BroadyBroady (3-6 6-3 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (7-63 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Kevin AndersonAnderson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-1) – H2H and prediction