Botic Van De Zandschulp and Alejandro Tabilo will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Zagreb Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 17. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alejandro Tabilo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alejandro Tabilo is the pick to win this match.
Alejandro Tabilo -> 1.86
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Alejandro Tabilo
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Alejandro Tabilo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 154, Van De Zandschulp got to the 2nd round after beating Michael Mmoh 6-4 3-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Botic defeated Mmoh (6-4 3-6 7-5). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 104 points vs Mmoh’s 102. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 65% of his first serves in, winning 64% (41/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Mmoh 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (206-104). 2-2 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has a 107-61 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Dutch has a 11-7 win-loss record in 2021, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zagreb Challenger
Van De Zandschulp has never competed in this tournament before.
Alejandro Tabilo
Ranked no. 166, Alejandro got to the 2nd round after defeating Benjamin Bonzi 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Chilean had a good straight sets win against Bonzi (6-4 6-1). During the match Tabilo scored 59 points vs Bonzi’s 44. Tabilo was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Tabilo blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alejandro Tabilo was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Alejandro broke Bonzi 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Tabilo’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Concepcion Challenger.
Alejandro has a 14-13 win-loss record in 2021, 12-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 17 |
| Pts | 104-102 | 59-44 |
| Total Points | 206 | 103 |
| Winners | 41 | 23 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Tabilo played 1 match. At the moment, Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded 1 set while Alejandro Tabilo hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set more than Tabilo (3 vs 2). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 14 games more than Tabilo. The Dutch scored 41 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Tabilo fired 23 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 64/98 | 27/51 |
| %1st in | 65% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 41/64 | 23/27 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 14/24 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 58% |
Van De Zandschulp fired 1 ace . Tabilo also scored 2 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 64% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Tabilo won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Tabilo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 29% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 4 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 60% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp lost his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Alejandro broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Alejandro was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Mmoh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 104-102 | 104-102 | |
| Total points | 206 | 206 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 64/98 | 64/98 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 41/64 | 41/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Tabilo | |||
| R1 Bonzi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 59-44 | 59-44 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/51 | 27/51 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWL
LWLLLWWLWW Tennis Scores in Zagreb Challenger
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Pedro SousaSousa (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 6-71 6-3) – See score progression
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-3 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Ernests GulbisGulbis (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Go SoedaSoeda (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Michael MmohMmoh (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Blaz RolaRola – Antun VidakVidak (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrej MartinMartin – Jason JungJung (2-6 7-64 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blaz RolaRola – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Sebastian BaezBaez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Leonardo MayerMayer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Andrej MartinMartin (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
