Jenson Brooksby and Bjorn Fratangelo will fight against each other in the final of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:30 pm on STADIUM COURT. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bjorn Fratangelo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bjorn Fratangelo is the pick to win this match.
Bjorn Fratangelo -> 1.72
Jenson Brooksby -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jenson Brooksby vs. Bjorn Fratangelo
This will be the 2nd time that Jenson Brooksby and Bjorn Fratangelo square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Fratangelo (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Fratangelo won 7-5 6-4 in the final in the Cleveland Challenger back in March 2021.
Jenson Brooksby
Ranked no. 194 (career high), Jenson got to the final after defeating Martin Damm 6-711 6-1 6-2, Thiago Seyboth Wild 7-66 6-4, Michael Mmoh 1-6 6-1 4-1 ret. and Facundo Mena 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the semifinal, Brooksby defeated Mena (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match Brooksby scored 99 points vs Mena’s 88. Brooksby was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brooksby recorded 3 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults. Jenson Brooksby lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Brooksby put 60% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (21/33) on the 2nd serve. Jenson broke Mena 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Brooksby started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 2 set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Brooksby has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (95-48). 4-0 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Brooksby has a 16-7 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Jenson’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Potchefstroom 2 Challenger,the Cleveland Challenger and the Orlando Challenger.
Jenson has a 22-4 win-loss record in 2021, 4-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Brooksby has never competed in this tournament before.
Bjorn Fratangelo
Ranked no. 221, Bjorn got to the final after beating Ivo Karlovic 7-65 6-73 7-64, Yosuke Watanuki w/o, Thai Kwiatkowski 7-5 6-4 and Denis Kudla 7-62 6-2.
In the semifinal, Bjorn had a good straight sets win against Kudla (7-62 6-2). During the match Fratangelo scored 77 points vs Kudla’s 66. Fratangelo was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Fratangelo fired 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Bjorn Fratangelo was very effective on serve to win 73% (27/37) of his 1st serve and 59% (22/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kudla 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Bjorn’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
Bjorn has a 15-5 win-loss record in 2021, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brooksby | Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 12 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 99 | 82 |
| Pts | 369-313 | 269-244 |
| Total Points | 682 | 513 |
| Winners | 145 | 108 |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% |
Brooksby played 4 matches while Fratangelo competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jenson Brooksby lost 3 sets, while Bjorn Fratangelo dropped 1 set. Brooksby has played 5 sets more than Fratangelo (12 vs 7). Therefore, Brooksby played 17 games more than Fratangelo. The American scored 145 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Bjorn fired 108 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brooksby | Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 206/311 | 139/254 |
| %1st in | 66% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 145/206 | 108/139 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 60/105 | 64/115 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 56% |
Brooksby managed to score 10 aces (2.5 per match). Fratangelo managed to score 21 aces (7 per match). Brooksby won 70% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Fratangelo won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brooksby | Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 9 |
| Converted | 16/48 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 33% | 50% |
| Conceded | 22 | 13 |
| Saved | 15 | 8 |
| % Saved | 68% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 5 |
Brooksby broke his opponents 16 times with a 33% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. Bjorn conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Brooksby | ||||||
| R1 Damm |
R2 Seyboth |
1/4 Mmoh |
1/2 Mena |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-711 6-1 6-2 | 7-66 6-4 | 1-6 6-1 4-1 ret. | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 23 | 19 | 29 | 99 | |
| pts | 117-91 | 84-70 | 69-64 | 99-88 | 369-313 | |
| Total points | 208 | 154 | 133 | 187 | 682 | |
| Winners | 57 | 34 | 22 | 32 | 145 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 40% | 32% | 32% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 82/107 | 43/69 | 32/53 | 49/82 | 206/311 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 62% | 60% | 60% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 57/82 | 34/43 | 22/32 | 32/49 | 145/206 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 79% | 69% | 65% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 18/26 | 10/21 | 21/33 | 60/105 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 69% | 48% | 64% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 1/8 | 4/14 | 5/13 | 16/48 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 13% | 29% | 38% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 22 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 1/1 | 2/4 | 6/9 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 50% | 67% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Fratangelo | ||||||
| R1 Karlovic |
R2 Watanuki |
1/4 Kwiatkowski |
1/2 Kudla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-73 7-64 | w/o | 7-5 6-4 | 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | – | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 39 | – | 22 | 21 | 82 | |
| pts | 120-118 | – | 72-60 | 77-66 | 269-244 | |
| Total points | 238 | – | 132 | 143 | 513 | |
| Winners | 54 | – | 27 | 27 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 45% | – | 38% | 35% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | – | 6 | 7 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | – | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 64/116 | – | 38/64 | 37/74 | 139/254 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | – | 59% | 50% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 54/64 | – | 27/38 | 27/37 | 108/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | – | 71% | 73% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 33/52 | – | 9/26 | 22/37 | 64/115 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | – | 35% | 59% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 0 | – | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 0/1 | – | 6/11 | 3/6 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 0% | – | 55% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | – | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | – | 3/7 | 5/6 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 43% | 83% | 32% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | – | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
