Bernard Tomic and John-Patrick Smith will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Australian Open Qualifying for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3.30 pm on Court 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 5 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernard Tomic is the pick to win this match.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.88
John-Patrick Smith -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. John-Patrick Smith
This will be the 2nd time that Bernard Tomic and John-Patrick Smith fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Smith (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
Bernard Tomic
Ranked no. 228, Bernard got to the qualifications after defeating Jozef Kovalik 6-4 3-6 6-4 and Tristan Schoolkate 6-4 1-6 7-63.
In the qualifications, Tomic defeated Schoolkate (6-4 1-6 7-63).-102) than Schoolkate. In fact, the world no. 228 won 102 points vs Schoolkate’s. That means that Tomic was more focused during the important points. Bernard was extremely aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tomic recorded 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 71% of his first serves in, winning 69% (49/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (12/29) on the 2nd serve. Bernard broke Schoolkate 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Bernard has surrendered 2 set in this event to win 50% of the points he played.
Tomic has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (219-193). 2-0 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tomic has a 127-86 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Australian has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
John-Patrick Smith
Ranked no. 315, Smith got to the qualifications after beating Paolo Lorenzi 7-5 6-1 and Tallon Griekspoor 2-6 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Griekspoor, John-Patrick recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Smith scored 79 points vs Griekspoor’s 73. Smith was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Smith managed to score 5 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. John-Patrick Smith lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Smith put 71% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the 2nd serve. John-Patrick broke Griekspoor twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Smith has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
John-Patrick has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 59 | 46 |
| Pts | 194-193 | 149-127 |
| Total Points | 387 | 276 |
| Winners | 89 | 75 |
| %Winners | 46% | 50% |
Both Tomic and Smith played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Bernard Tomic conceded 2 sets, while John-Patrick Smith dropper 1 set. Tomic has played 1 set more than Smith (6 vs 5). Therefore, Tomic played 13 games more than Smith. Tomic scored 89 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Smith managed to score 75 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 124/184 | 103/143 |
| %1st in | 67% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 89/124 | 75/103 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 31/60 | 23/40 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 58% |
Tomic struck 15 aces (7.5 per match). Smith scored 10 aces (5 per match). Tomic won 72% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Smith won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 36% | 46% |
| Conceded | 12 | 16 |
| Saved | 7 | 13 |
| % Saved | 58% | 81% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Tomic broke his opponents 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Tomic lost his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Smith broke his opponents 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. John-Patrick conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | ||||
| Q1 Kovalik |
Q2 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | 6-4 1-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 30 | 59 | |
| pts | 92-87 | 102-106 | 194-193 | |
| Total points | 179 | 208 | 387 | |
| Winners | 40 | 49 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 53/84 | 71/100 | 124/184 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 71% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 40/53 | 49/71 | 89/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 69% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/31 | 12/29 | 31/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 41% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/7 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 43% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 10 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 6/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 60% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Smith | ||||
| Q1 Lorenzi |
Q2 Griekspoor |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 27 | 46 | |
| pts | 70-54 | 79-73 | 149-127 | |
| Total points | 124 | 152 | 276 | |
| Winners | 37 | 38 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 48% | 50% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 48/65 | 55/78 | 103/143 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 71% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 37/48 | 38/55 | 75/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 69% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/17 | 17/23 | 23/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 74% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 2/6 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 33% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 5 | 16 | |
| Saved | 10/11 | 3/5 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 91% | 60% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWL
Tennis Scores at the Australian Open Qualifying
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-1 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ulises BlanchBlanch (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (w/o) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Steven DiezDiez (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-3 6-71 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Denis KudlaKudla (w/o) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 1-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Yannick MadenMaden (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (7-61 7-64) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Blaz RolaRola (6-2 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Julian LenzLenz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (2-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Antoine HoangHoang (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Zhe LiLi (2-6 6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Cem IlkelIlkel (2-6 7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- John-Patrick SmithSmith – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Max PurcellPurcell (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Quentin HalysHalys (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – John-Patrick SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Viktor TroickiTroicki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Elias YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael MmohMmoh (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
