[UPDATED R2]. Prediction, H2H of Gastao Elias’s draw vs Sousa, Coppejans, Laaksonen, Kovalik to win the Maia Challenger

Maia Challenger draw preview with H2H - Gastao Elias may need to overcome Pedro Sousa, Kimmer Coppejans, Henri Laaksonen, Jozef Kovalik to conquer the tournament in the Maia Challenger.

Gastao Elias Stats info

Gastao Elias is 4 wins away to conquer the title in the Maia Challenger. Gastao has defeated Pavel Kotov 6-2 7-5 to reach the 2nd round where he will face Pedro Sousa.

Draw Prediction with head to head records

This is Gastao Elias’s projected draw with the plausible opposition at the the Maia Challenger. Gastao has a weak record (5-8) against the projected opposition.

R1 – Pavel Kotov (271) – 6-2 7-5
R2 – Pedro Sousa (113) – H2H 2-2
1/4 – Kimmer Coppejans (179) – H2H 2-0
or Marco Trungelliti (247) – H2H 1-2
1/2 – Henri Laaksonen (135) – H2H 0-0
or Paolo Lorenzi (144) – H2H 2-3
Fin – Jozef Kovalik (131) – H2H 1-6
or Carlos Taberner (131) – H2H 0-0

See Updated Draw

R2 – Pedro Sousa’s rankings and performance.

Head to head record 2-2

Pedro Sousa Point Table info

Pedro Sousa has a 18-16 record in 2020, 17-13 on clay. During the previous 5 years, Pedro has a 432-240 record on clay (Click here to see full career record). The Portuguese won 5 of his last 10 matches.

Pedro’s best achievement of the year was getting to the final in Buenos Aires, the Split Challenger and the Lisbon Challenger.

Last year in the Maia Challenger the Portuguese capitulated to Riccardo Bonadio in the 3rd round 4-6 6-2 7-5.

H2H Gastao Elias vs. Pedro Sousa

This contest would be 4th time that Gastao Elias and Pedro Sousa clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Sousa (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on clay at challenger or futures level.

1/4 – Kimmer Coppejans’s rankings and performance.

Head to head 2-0 for Gastao Elias

Kimmer Coppejans Point Table info

Kimmer Coppejans has a 14-16 win-loss record in 2020, 5-8 on clay. Talking about the previous 5 years, the Belgian has a 228-133 record on clay (Click here to see full career record). Coppejans won 4 of his last 10 matches.

Kimmer’s best result of this season was reaching the semifinal in the Launceston Challenger.

Last year in the Maia Challenger Coppejans didn’t compete in this event.

H2H Gastao Elias vs. Kimmer Coppejans

This contest would be 3rd time that Gastao Elias and Kimmer Coppejans clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Elias (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay at challenger or futures level.

Anyhow, Gastao Elias could fight against Marco Trungelliti. Their H2H record is 2-1 for Marco Trungelliti.

1/2 – Henri Laaksonen’s rankings and performance.

Head to head record 0-0 in Challenger and Futures

Henri Laaksonen Point Table info

Henri Laaksonen has a 15-14 win-loss record in 2020, 8-5 on clay. In the previous 5 years, Henri has a 165-138 record on clay (Click here to see full career record). The Swiss won 6 of his last 10 matches.

Last year in the Maia Challenger Laaksonen didn’t play in this event.

H2H Gastao Elias vs. Henri Laaksonen

There is no head to head record between Gastao Elias and Henri Laaksonen since this would be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

On the other hand, Gastao Elias may square off with Paolo Lorenzi. Their H2H record is 3-2 for Paolo Lorenzi.

Final – Jozef Kovalik’s rankings and performance.

Head to head 6-1 for Jozef Kovalik

Jozef Kovalik Point Table info

Jozef Kovalik has a 16-15 win-loss record in 2020, 14-11 on clay. Regarding the previous 5 years, the Slovakian has a 276-159 record on clay (Click here to see full career record). The Slovakian won 5 of his last 10 matches.

Last year in the Maia Challenger Kovalik won the title after defeating Constant Lestienne 6-0 6-4.

H2H Gastao Elias vs. Jozef Kovalik

This would be the 5th time that Gastao Elias and Jozef Kovalik square off. The head to head is 3-1 for Kovalik (see full H2H stats), 4-1 on clay at challenger or futures level.

However, Gastao Elias could square off with Carlos Taberner. Their H2H record is 0-0.