Garrett Johns and Denis Kudla will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Cary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on STADIUM. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Denis Kudla who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Denis Kudla is the pick to win this match.
Denis Kudla -> 1.092
Garrett Johns -> 6.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Garrett Johns vs. Denis Kudla
There is no head to head record between Garrett Johns and Denis Kudla since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Garrett Johns
Ranked no. (career high), Garrett reached the 2nd round after defeating Noah Rubin 4-6 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round against Rubin, Johns recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-5). During the match Johns scored 108 points vs Rubin’s 96. Garrett was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Johns struck 6 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Garrett Johns was exceptionally efficent on serve to win 72% (44/61) of his 1st serve and 63% (25/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Rubin 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Johns has won exactly 50% of his matches (1-1) in the last 3 years. 1-0 on hard in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Johns has a 1-1 record in the last 3 years on hard.
Garrett has a 1-0 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Cary Challenger
Garrett didn’t play in the Cary Challenger in 2019.
Denis Kudla
Ranked no. 124, Kudla got to the 2nd round after beating Kevin King 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against King (6-2 6-1). During the match Kudla scored 57 points vs King’s 29. Denis was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Kudla scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Denis Kudla was exceptionally effective on serve to win 85% (17/20) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke King 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Denis’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Dallas Challenger.
Kudla has a 13-8 win-loss record in 2020, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Johns | Kudla |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 31 | 15 |
Pts | 108-96 | 57-29 |
Total Points | 204 | 86 |
Winners | 44 | 17 |
%Winners | 41% | 30% |
Both Johns and Kudla played 1 match. At the moment, Garrett Johns surrendered 1 set while Denis Kudla hasn’t dropped a set so far. Johns has played 1 set more than Kudla (3 vs 2). Therefore, Johns played 16 games more than Kudla. Johns scored 44 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 17 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Johns | Kudla |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 1 |
Avg per match | 6 | 1 |
1st in | 61/101 | 20/38 |
%1st in | 60% | 53% |
1st pts | 44/61 | 17/20 |
%1st pts | 72% | 85% |
2nd pts | 25/40 | 13/18 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 72% |
Johns managed to score 6 aces . Kudla scored 1 ace . Johns won 72% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Kudla won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 72% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Johns | Kudla |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/9 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 33% | 71% |
Conceded | 9 | 0 |
Saved | 7 | 0 |
% Saved | 78% | NAN% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Johns broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Johns lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Kudla broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Kudla was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Johns | |||
R1 Rubin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 108-96 | 108-96 | |
Total points | 204 | 204 | |
Winners | 44 | 44 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 61/101 | 61/101 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 44/61 | 44/61 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 25/40 | 25/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kudla | |||
R1 King |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 57-29 | 57-29 | |
Total points | 86 | 86 | |
Winners | 17 | 17 | |
%Winners | 30% | 30% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 20/38 | 20/38 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 17/20 | 17/20 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 13/18 | 13/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Cary Challenger
- Thomaz BellucciBellucci – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-74 6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Guilherme ClezarClezar (7-65 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Jack SockSock – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (7-611 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (4-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Elias YmerYmer (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – William BlumbergBlumberg (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kevin KingKing (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Aleksandr NedovesovNedovesov (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Ulises BlanchBlanch (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Christian HarrisonHarrison (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Noah RubinRubin (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (4-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Jack SockSock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Christopher EubanksEubanks (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction