Prajnesh Gunneswaran and Lukas Lacko will face off in the 2nd round of the Ismaning Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 8:00 pm on CENTRE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Lacko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lukas Lacko is the pick to win this match.
Lukas Lacko -> 1.55
Prajnesh Gunneswaran -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Prajnesh Gunneswaran vs. Lukas Lacko
This will be the 2nd time that Prajnesh Gunneswaran and Lukas Lacko face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Lacko (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on carpet.
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Ranked no. 152, Prajnesh reached the 2nd round after defeating Tomas Martin Etcheverry 6-4 3-6 7-63.
In the 1st round, The Indian defeated Martin Etcheverry (6-4 3-6 7-63). During the match Gunneswaran scored 106 points vs Martin Etcheverry’s 100. Gunneswaran was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gunneswaran scored 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Prajnesh Gunneswaran was pretty effective on serve to win 81% (38/47) of his 1st serve and 66% (25/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Indian broke Martin Etcheverry once after converting 6% of his break points (1/16).
Gunneswaran has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (246-144). 1-0 on carpet in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gunneswaran has a 6-5 match record in the last 9 years on carpet.
Prajnesh has a 8-11 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Gunneswaran didn’t compete in the Ismaning Challenger in 2019.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 188, the Slovakian got to the 2nd round after defeating Max Hans Rehberg 5-7 7-64 6-1.
In the 1st round against Hans Rehberg, The Slovakian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-64 6-1). During the match Lacko scored 111 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 101. Lacko was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Lacko recorded 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Lukas Lacko lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Lacko put 57% of his first serves in, winning 71% (41/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (20/44) on the 2nd serve. Lacko broke Hans Rehberg 7 times after converting 70% of his break points (7/10).
The Slovakian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semi-finals in the Quimper Challenger.
The Slovakian has a 7-11 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Lukas conquered the title last year in Ismaning Challenger after downing Maxime Cressy .
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gunneswaran | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 |
| Pts | 106-100 | 111-101 |
| Total Points | 206 | 212 |
| Winners | 38 | 41 |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% |
Both Gunneswaran and Lacko played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Prajnesh Gunneswaran conceded 1 set, while Lukas Lacko dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Gunneswaran and Lacko have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (32). The Indian scored 38 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian blasted 41 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gunneswaran | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 8 |
| 1st in | 47/85 | 58/102 |
| %1st in | 55% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 38/47 | 41/58 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 25/38 | 20/44 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 45% |
Gunneswaran made 6 aces . Lacko made 8 aces . Gunneswaran won 81% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Lacko won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gunneswaran | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 7 |
| Converted | 1/16 | 7/10 |
| % Converted | 6% | 70% |
| Conceded | 4 | 10 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
The Indian broke his opponent once with a 6% conversion rate. Gunneswaran lost his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Lukas broke his opponent 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. Lacko conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gunneswaran | |||
| R1 Martin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 106-100 | 106-100 | |
| Total points | 206 | 206 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 47/85 | 47/85 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 38/47 | 38/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/38 | 25/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/16 | 1/16 | |
| Converted % | 6% | 6% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Lacko | |||
| R1 Hans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 111-101 | 111-101 | |
| Total points | 212 | 212 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 58/102 | 58/102 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 41/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/44 | 20/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 70% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Ismaning Challenger
- Daniel MasurMasur – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Julian LenzLenz – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (5-7 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Maxime CressyCressy (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (5-7 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Matteo ViolaViola – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Viktor TroickiTroicki (4-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Quentin HalysHalys (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (5-7 7-6(4) 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Maxime CressyCressy (7-5 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yannick MadenMaden – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Lukas LackoLacko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Matteo ViolaViola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
