Antoine Hoang and Matteo Viola will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Antoine Hoang who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Antoine Hoang is the pick to win this match.
Antoine Hoang -> 1.27
Matteo Viola -> 3.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Antoine Hoang vs. Matteo Viola
There is no head to head record between Antoine Hoang and Matteo Viola since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Antoine Hoang
Ranked no. 134, the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Viktor Troicki 4-6 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round against Troicki, the French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-1). During the match Hoang scored 92 points vs Troicki’s 76. Antoine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hoang wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Antoine Hoang lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Hoang put 70% of his first serves in, winning 75% (45/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. the French player broke Troicki 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Hoang has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (183-116). 1-0 on carpet in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hoang has a 9-2 match record in the last 5 years on carpet.
The French player best result of the season was reaching the semi-finals in the Cherbourg Challenger and the Todi Challenger.
Antoine has a 10-12 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
Antoine didn’t play in the Ismaning Challenger in 2019.
Matteo Viola
Ranked no. 231, Matteo reached the 2nd round after beating Brandon Nakashima 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Nakashima, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Viola scored 104 points vs Nakashima’s 96. Matteo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Viola bagged 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Matteo Viola lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Viola put 70% of his first serves in, winning 69% (44/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the 2nd serve. Matteo broke Nakashima 4 times after converting 25% of his break points (4/16).
Viola’s best result of the year was getting to the semi-finals in the Noumea Challenger.
Viola has a 12-12 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ismaning Challenger
The Italian didn’t play in the Ismaning Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hoang | Viola |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 |
| Pts | 92-76 | 104-96 |
| Total Points | 168 | 200 |
| Winners | 45 | 44 |
| %Winners | 49% | 42% |
Both Hoang and Viola played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Antoine Hoang conceded 1 set, while Matteo Viola dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Hoang and Viola have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (29). the French player scored 45 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Viola managed to score 44 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hoang | Viola |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 60/86 | 64/92 |
| %1st in | 70% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 44/64 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 15/28 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 54% |
Hoang didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Viola blasted 4 aces . Hoang won 75% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Viola won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hoang | Viola |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/16 |
| % Converted | 56% | 25% |
| Conceded | 6 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Hoang broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Antoine lost his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 25% conversion rate. Matteo conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hoang | |||
| R1 Troicki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 92-76 | 92-76 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 60/86 | 60/86 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 45/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 13/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Viola | |||
| R1 Nakashima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 104-96 | 104-96 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 64/92 | 64/92 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 44/64 | 44/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/16 | 4/16 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWLWLL
Tennis Scores in Ismaning Challenger
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Julian LenzLenz – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (5-7 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Maxime CressyCressy (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (5-7 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Viktor TroickiTroicki (4-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-4 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Matteo ViolaViola – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Quentin HalysHalys (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (5-7 7-6(4) 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Maxime CressyCressy (7-5 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yannick MadenMaden – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Lukas LackoLacko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Matteo ViolaViola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
