Laura Siegemund and Paula Badosa Gibert will clash against each other in the 4th round of the French Open for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11 am on Court Simonne MATHIEU. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laura Siegemund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Laura Siegemund is the pick to win this match.
Laura Siegemund -> 1.63
Paula Badosa Gibert -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Laura Siegemund vs. Paula Badosa Gibert
This will be the 3rd time that Laura Siegemund and Paula Badosa Gibert play each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Siegemund won 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the 1st round in the 1100032311 back in 1970.
Laura Siegemund
Ranked no. 66, Siegemund got to the 1st round after defeating Kristina Mladenovic 7-5 6-3, Julia Goerges 1-6 6-1 6-3 and Petra Martic 6-75 6-3 6-0.
In the 3rd round against Martic, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-3 6-0). During the match Siegemund scored 97 points vs Martic’s 73. Laura was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Siegemund scored just 1 ace in the match and she committed only 8 double faults. Overall, Laura Siegemund was extremely efficent on serve to win 72% (34/47) of her 1st serve and 53% (20/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Laura broke Martic 7 times after converting 78% of her break points (7/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Laura has conceded 2 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points she played.
Siegemund has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 65% of her matches (299-164). 7-2 on clay in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Siegemund has a 205-83 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Laura has a 18-8 win-loss record in 2020, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Siegemund lost in the 2nd round to Belinda Bencic.
Paula Badosa Gibert
Ranked no. 87, Paula got to the 1st round after beating Kateryna Kozlova 6-2 4-6 6-3, Sloane Stephens 6-4 4-6 6-2 and Jelena Ostapenko 6-4 6-3.
In the 3rd round, Badosa had a good straight sets win against Ostapenko (6-4 6-3). During the match Badosa scored 71 points vs Ostapenko’s 61. Paula was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Badosa blasted 7 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Paula Badosa Gibert lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Badosa put 71% of her first serves in, winning 61% (30/49) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Badosa broke Ostapenko 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Badosa has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Paula’s best result of the season was getting to the semi-finals in the W60 Burnie and Istanbul.
The Spaniard has a 13-7 win-loss record in 2020, 6-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Paula lost in the qualifications to Tamara Korpatsch.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siegemund | Badosa |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 72 | 74 |
| Pts | 252-212 | 258-208 |
| Total Points | 464 | 466 |
| Winners | 91 | 95 |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% |
Both Siegemund and Badosa played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Laura Siegemund conceded 2 sets, while Paula Badosa Gibert dropper 2 sets. Talking about their workload, Siegemund and Badosa have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Siegemund played 2 games less than Badosa. Siegemund scored 91 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Paula struck 95 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siegemund | Badosa |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 0.7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 138/233 | 148/217 |
| %1st in | 59% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 91/138 | 95/148 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 48/95 | 39/69 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 57% |
Siegemund blasted 2 aces (0.7 per match). Badosa bagged 18 aces (6 per match). Siegemund won 66% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Badosa won 64% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siegemund | Badosa |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 18 | 18 |
| Converted | 18/28 | 18/35 |
| % Converted | 64% | 51% |
| Conceded | 24 | 17 |
| Saved | 15 | 7 |
| % Saved | 63% | 41% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 10 |
Laura broke her opponents 18 times with a 64% conversion rate. Siegemund conceded her serve 9 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded. The Spaniard broke her opponents 18 times with a 51% conversion rate. Badosa conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 41% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siegemund | |||||
| R1 Mladenovic |
R2 Goerges |
R3 Martic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | 6-75 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 23 | 28 | 72 | |
| pts | 83-67 | 72-72 | 97-73 | 252-212 | |
| Total points | 150 | 144 | 170 | 464 | |
| Winners | 29 | 28 | 34 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 39% | 35% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 13 | 8 | 24 | |
| 1st in | 48/74 | 43/74 | 47/85 | 138/233 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 58% | 55% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/48 | 28/43 | 34/47 | 91/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 65% | 72% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 12/31 | 20/38 | 48/95 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 39% | 53% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 7 | 18 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 6/9 | 7/9 | 18/28 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 67% | 78% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 7 | 5 | 24 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 3/7 | 3/5 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 43% | 60% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Badosa | |||||
| R1 Kozlova |
R2 Stephens |
R3 Ostapenko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 28 | 19 | 74 | |
| pts | 100-78 | 87-69 | 71-61 | 258-208 | |
| Total points | 178 | 156 | 132 | 466 | |
| Winners | 31 | 34 | 30 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 39% | 42% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 2 | 7 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 53/79 | 46/69 | 49/69 | 148/217 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | 71% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 31/53 | 34/46 | 30/49 | 95/148 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 74% | 61% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 14/23 | 10/20 | 39/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 61% | 50% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 8 | 5 | 5 | 18 | |
| Converted | 8/15 | 5/13 | 5/7 | 18/35 | |
| Converted % | 53% | 38% | 71% | 51% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 8 | 17 | |
| Saved | 1/6 | 0/3 | 6/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 17% | 0% | 75% | 31% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWW
LWWWLWWLWW Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Kiki BertensBertens (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Caroline GarciaGarcia (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Simona HalepHalep (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fiona FerroFerro – Sofia KeninKenin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Shuai ZhangZhang (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
