![Prediction And Head To Head Chun Hsin Tseng Vs. Blaz Kavcic Iqxnhh2w4b Prediction and head to head Chun Hsin Tseng vs. Blaz Kavcic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Chun-Hsin-Tseng-vs.-Blaz-Kavcic-IqxNHH2w4b.jpg)
Chun Hsin Tseng and Blaz Kavcic will face off in the 2nd round of the Biella Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CAMPO 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chun Hsin Tseng who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chun Hsin Tseng is the pick to win this match.
Chun Hsin Tseng -> 1.34
Blaz Kavcic -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chun Hsin Tseng vs. Blaz Kavcic
There is no head to head record between Chun Hsin Tseng and Blaz Kavcic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chun Hsin Tseng
Ranked no. 287, Hsin Tseng got to the 2nd round after defeating Marco Trungelliti 6-3 6-3, Filippo Baldi 7-5 6-0 and Andrew Harris 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Harris (6-1 6-2). During the match Hsin Tseng scored 67 points vs Harris’s 47. Hsin Tseng was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hsin Tseng struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chun Hsin Tseng conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Hsin Tseng put 59% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the 2nd serve. Hsin Tseng broke Harris 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Hsin Tseng has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 66% of his matches (107-54). 3-1 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hsin Tseng has a 24-15 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
Hsin Tseng’s best result of the year was getting to the semi-finals in the Bergamo Challenger.
The Chinese has a 14-6 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Biella Challenger
Hsin Tseng didn’t play in the Biella Challenger in 2019.
Blaz Kavcic
Ranked no. 298, Kavcic reached the 2nd round after defeating Sumit Nagal 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Slovenian had a good straight sets win against Nagal (7-64 6-4). During the match Kavcic scored 78 points vs Nagal’s 69. Blaz was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Kavcic fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Blaz Kavcic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kavcic put 78% of his first serves in, winning 61% (36/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the 2nd serve. Blaz broke Nagal 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Slovenian has a 8-8 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Biella Challenger
Kavcic didn’t play in the Biella Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Hsin Tseng | Kavcic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 6 | 2 |
Tot Games | 51 | 23 |
Pts | 207-151 | 78-69 |
Total Points | 358 | 147 |
Winners | 75 | 36 |
%Winners | 36% | 46% |
Hsin Tseng played 3 matches while Kavcic competed in 1 match. Hsin Tseng started his run from the qualifications while Kavcic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Hsin Tseng has played 4 sets more than Kavcic (6 vs 2). Therefore, Hsin Tseng played 28 games more than Kavcic. Chun scored 75 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Kavcic fired 36 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Hsin Tseng | Kavcic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 2 |
Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
1st in | 110/164 | 59/76 |
%1st in | 67% | 78% |
1st pts | 75/110 | 36/59 |
%1st pts | 68% | 61% |
2nd pts | 32/54 | 11/17 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 65% |
Hsin Tseng made 9 aces (3 per match). Kavcic bagged 2 aces . Hsin Tseng won 68% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Kavcic won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Hsin Tseng | Kavcic |
---|---|---|
Won | 14 | 4 |
Converted | 14/24 | 4/8 |
% Converted | 58% | 50% |
Conceded | 14 | 7 |
Saved | 11 | 4 |
% Saved | 79% | 57% |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Hsin Tseng broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Kavcic broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kavcic conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
Hsin Tseng | |||||
Q1 Trungelliti |
Q3 Baldi |
R1 Harris |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-5 6-0 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 15 | 51 | |
pts | 76-60 | 64-44 | 67-47 | 207-151 | |
Total points | 136 | 108 | 114 | 358 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | 23 | 75 | |
%Winners | 34% | 41% | 34% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
1st in | 39/55 | 38/53 | 33/56 | 110/164 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 72% | 59% | 67% | |
1st pts | 26/39 | 26/38 | 23/33 | 75/110 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 68% | 70% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 8/16 | 10/15 | 14/23 | 32/54 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 67% | 61% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/8 | 4/5 | 14/24 | |
Converted % | 45% | 63% | 80% | 58% | |
Conceded | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 0/1 | 6/6 | 11 | |
Saved % | 71% | 0% | 100% | 57% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Kavcic | |||||
R1 Nagal |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |||
pts | 78-69 | 78-69 | |||
Total points | 147 | 147 | |||
Winners | 36 | 36 | |||
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |||
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
1st in | 59/76 | 59/76 | |||
% 1st in | 78% | 78% | |||
1st pts | 36/59 | 36/59 | |||
% 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |||
2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |||
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | |||
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |||
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |||
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |||
Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |||
Saved % | 57% | 19% | |||
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Biella Challenger
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (2-6 7-68 7-62) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (7-60 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Guillermo Garcia-LopezGarcia-Lopez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Gabriele FellineFelline (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Lukas LackoLacko (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Blaz RolaRola – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Sumit NagalNagal (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Andrew HarrisHarris (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo ViolaViola – Federico GaioGaio (4-6 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (7-5 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Tommy RobredoRobredo (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blaz RolaRola – Andrea CollariniCollarini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Facundo BagnisBagnis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Matteo ViolaViola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction